Bob Stuart's MQA - Vision or Hype?

Bob Stuart is best known in the hi-fi scene as the co-founder and developer of Meridian Audio. For several years now, however, the Briton has been making a name for itself with the MQA audio codec. With this new format, Stuart wants nothing less than the digital music distribution to revolutionize the music industry. With the recent start of MQA streaming on TIDAL in Hires quality, he could already have succeeded.

Disputable topic

Since the first presentation of MQA ( Master Quality Authenticated ) in 2014, discussions around the world have been booming. And as usual, when something new emerges in the world of high-quality sound reproduction, these discussions are unfortunately often characterized by prejudice, wild speculation and ignorance. At least the lack of knowledge is entirely excusable in this context, because MQA can hardly be explained, let alone understood, without profound knowledge of digital audio data and current developments in information theory.

Why MQA?

To put it simply, Stuart and his business partner Peter Craven see the current "hires" trend towards higher and higher sampling rates and resolutions as a negative development. It has long been a recognized fact that audio information beyond the previously postulated "hearing threshold" of 20 kHz definitely has an influence on the sound quality of a recording. That is why digital recordings with more than CD quality (44.1 kHz / 16 bit) make perfect sense ( a digital music file can reproduce sound frequencies up to the so-called Nyquist frequency, which corresponds to half the sampling frequency. 1 kHz can therefore map frequencies up to 22.5 kHz. ) According to Stuart and Craven, the actual information content that can be recorded with higher sampling frequencies is comparatively low, but it comes at the cost of an enormous increase in the data rate and thus the file size. In other words, a 96 kHz / 24 bit file is more than twice the size of the same CD-quality track, but it doesn’t offer twice as much audio information. This effect becomes even clearer when stepping from 96 kHz / 24 bit to 192 kHz / 24 bit. In turn, the file size doubles here, but the gain in information is only minimal. The vast majority of the additional data is (according to Stuart and Craven) wasted on digitizing silence and noise.

Information content of a music recording using the example of a Ravel recording ( red line: music signal, blue line: basic noise of the recording ): A scan at 48 kHz ( green area A ) already captures a large part of the music information up to 24 kHz. When scanning at 96 kHz ( twice the file size, pink area B ), relevant information is added up to 48 kHz, but only to a small extent. A further doubling of the sampling frequency and file size to 192 kHz ( purple area C ) hardly provides any additional information that the useful signal is practically completely lost in the background noise. It is also noticeable that the higher dynamic resolution of the 24-bit recordings compared to the 16-bit recordings ( light green line at approx. -120 dB ) only covers areas that are lost in the noise anyway.

Origami with music

MQA is now taking a different approach. The codec focuses on the area where most of the music information is and preserves it perfectly. The additional information in higher frequency ranges is recorded in compressed form and hidden in the noise range of the lower frequencies, so to speak. This process, which Stuart describes as "music origami", can also be repeated: The information from a recording with 192 kHz / 24 bit is first "folded" into a file with 96 kHz / 24 bit, which is then again converted into 48 kHz / 24 bit is folded. The resulting file can finally be saved as a FLAC container and is only slightly larger than a conventional FLAC in CD quality (MQA speaks of approx. 20-30% additional file size), but much smaller than a hires file. This file can now be easily streamed or downloaded and played in CD quality on any conventional playback device. However, if the playback device is equipped with an MQA decoder, it can "unfold" the music origami it contains and play the recording in the original high-resolution master quality.

Video: Bob Stuart explains MQA's music origami (English)

Is MQA lossless?

So much for the theory (in a really simplified form). Immediately after the MQA announcement, however, the first vehement discussions sparked, for example about the question of the extent to which MQA can actually be viewed as a "lossless" codec. And Bob Stuart presses has been formulating himself extremely eloquently since then in front around a direct answer to this question. While it still seems understandable that a large part of the information contained in the upper frequency range can be saved with reduced data without an actual loss of information, the question remains how and where this information is hidden in the resulting file. At least in relation to the pure digital data, information has to be lost somewhere. At Wikipedia , MQA is therefore also referred to as "lossy". However, Stuart insists that no music information is lost, only useless digitized noise, which can also be restored when the file is decoded using appropriate filtering.

MQA sounds better - always!

MQA, Bob Stuart and increasingly others even go one step further: An MQA-coded piece of music should sound better even when it is played on a device that is not MQA-compatible. Sounds amazing, but in fact it is not far-fetched, because this is where "authentication" in the name of Master Quality Authenticated comes into play. Because MQA does not see itself as a pure codec, but rather as a standard that encompasses all aspects of digital music distribution from recording to playback. By far the largest part of the digital music catalog available in streaming or download was created by digitizing original analog master tapes. Especially with older digitizations, but still to a certain extent today, the analog-digital converters used generate different degrees of scanning inaccuracies during this process. Again, in a very simplified way, you can imagine it something like this: Up to the Nyquist frequency already mentioned, a digital scan can actually perfectly map the different frequencies of a music signal. However, it is considerably more difficult to correctly represent the edges of the signal, i.e. the swing in and out of the tone, especially with high tones whose frequency is close to the Nyquist frequency. The filtering used in the A / D conversion generates a "slower" signal here, i.e. a signal with a lower edge steepness. In addition, artifacts, so-called ringing, arise on both the settling and the decay side. In particular, overshoots on the settling side can have a drastic effect on the subjectively perceived sound quality, as they never occur with a naturally occurring noise. Stuart and Craven summarize these effects under the term "time smear" (for example: "temporal smear"). In their view, any digital file based on a tape master is inevitably affected. However, the two inventors have recognized that these errors have a very typical signature for each A / D converter used, like a kind of fingerprint, and can therefore be corrected.

This is how MQA ( blue line ) looks like a conventional coding in 192 kHz / 24 bit ( red line ). In the ideal case, MQA should be able to reproduce a music signal much more precisely in terms of time and, above all, without disruptive artifacts in the settling phase. Ideally, of course, this correction should be made when recording or converting. If it is known which A / D converter was used, existing digital recordings can also be corrected with the same accuracy. And in the event that this information is not known, MQA has developed a complex algorithm that analyzes an existing digital recording and identifies the "fingerprint" of the converter used. Before the actual MQA codec is used and carries out its "music origami", the time errors generated by the original analog-digital conversion are corrected. And that is why an MQA-coded file can sound better than the recordings previously available on a non-MQA device. Some testers even go so far as to certify that some MQA files that are played as 48 kHz on a conventional D / A converter without MQA support have a better sound quality than the comparable Hires files in 96 kHz or 192 kHz. However, in order to fully enjoy the original master quality, an MQA-compatible device is of course required. And here MQA has introduced a further level of authentication: Information is embedded in the MQA data stream, which can be used to verify that a streamed or downloaded file was not damaged or changed on the way. Licensed MQA devices have a corresponding indicator that lights up when the file being played has been authenticated using this information. According to MQA, this then means a sound quality that comes as close to the original recording as is possible with the existing equipment.

Philosophy and Business

Bob Stuart is often quoted as saying that MQA is much more of a philosophy than a codec. And certainly nobody wants to deny the experienced tinkerer the love for music and its best possible reproduction. But it is also a fact that Stuart, Craven and their company MQA, Ltd. want to make money with this technology. In order to fully enjoy the MQA sound quality, you need at least an MQA certified D / A converter. And the manufacturers of MQA products should of course pay a license fee for each device sold, as well as music studios and streaming services that want to advertise their offerings with the improved sound quality. That probably also explains why prominent representatives of hi-fi manufacturers on the Internet and elsewhere are vocal get excited join the MQA discussion. Because apart from the license costs that an integration of MQA would entail in their devices, many fear an interference in the construction of these devices. MQA stipulates the use of certain chipsets to decode and authenticate MQA. What exactly happens in this chip, of course, only MQA knows, all other manufacturers could not have any influence on the current state of knowledge. In particular, companies such as PS Audio or Chord Electronics, which have previously relied on self-developed D / A converter algorithms based on freely programmable FPGA chips, would have to completely change their technical approach if MQA were to become an indispensable standard in the hi-fi world.

Play MQA

This is probably one of the reasons why the list of partner manufacturers at MQA is still rather manageable. But in addition to - not surprisingly - Meridian, there are already some big names here with Pioneer, Onkyo, Technics and NAD, as well as smaller specialist providers such as Mytek, Aurender or Brinkmann. The name Bluesound also appears in this list, and due to the latest developments, this multiroom offshoot from NAD has a very special position in the market. Until recently, as usual with the introduction of a new standard, the very limited amount of MQA music available was one of the main arguments of the critics. There has been a framework agreement with Warner Music for some time, and the corresponding music is available for purchase on download portals such as HighResAudio.com or Onkyo Music . However, by and large, the music industry a few hundred audiophile albums are nothing more than footnotes. But since the beginning of January the MQA world has been very different.

MQA and TIDAL

Just in time for the start of the CES, the long-announced collaboration between MQA and the streaming service Tidal was finally launched. All subscribers to the "HiFi" premium offer from Tidal can now enjoy the ability to stream selected albums in the original master quality. The offer is currently still rather limited, but at least numerous classics from pop and rock history as well as current material from popular artists such as Beyoncé or Coldplay are available at any time. There is little doubt that streaming is the future of the music industry as a whole. But for real hi-fi fans looking for the best possible sound quality, high-resolution downloads were still the method of choice in the digital sector. But if MQA also delivers the promised quality in streaming and Tidal lives up to its announcement to offer all new albums in MQA with immediate effect, there is now at least an interesting alternative.

Tidal lists all previously available MQA titles under the heading "Masters" of the album overview and promises regular additions
Currently, the use of MQA is (almost) exclusively limited to the desktop versions of Tidal. In order for "real" MQA to leave the computer, the application must be set in such a way that it bypasses the sound and volume controls of the system ("exclusive mode")

MQA with bluesound

However, there is still one small restriction, and this is where bluesound comes into play again. Currently, Tidal's MQA support is limited to the desktop versions of the Tidal software for Windows and Mac. Mobile players and other systems are initially left out. All other systems? No, not quite, because a brave British-Canadian manufacturer of high-quality multiroom systems has done its homework and was able to offer a playback option on Tidal at the start of MQA that does not rely on a computer. All Bluesound products, including the apps for iOS and Android used for control, can already play Tidal MQA streams in full master tape quality. This includes, for example, the Bluesound Node 2 , which is simply connected to the existing hi-fi system, making every system MQA-compatible.

Multiroom in MQA quality? No problem with bluesound
Authentic quality - MQA playback in the Bluesound app Whether MQA is really the salvation of good sound, as Bob Stuart claims, or just hype, this article cannot and will not answer. The same goes for the many other open questions - what is the point of authenticating the master tape if it is known that during a music production or remastering there is usually a conversion between analog and digital as well as between different digital formats and sampling rates? And anyway, why does Bob Stuart ignore the entire range of electronic music in his explanations, which has been produced purely digitally for around 20 years, has in many cases neither seen a microphone nor an analog tape and therefore often has a much lower background noise than older ones Recordings? Is MQA only for hi-fi fans over the age of 60 who don't bother with such newfangled stuff? Hardly likely. The only really important question is how good MQA really sounds. Everything else is mere theory, which is why we are planning a detailed hearing test in the Hamm Auditorium in the near future. As soon as the key data have been determined, we will invite you here, on Facebook and via our newsletter , so that as many as possible will have the opportunity to form their own opinion about MQA.